Now, I don't know about you and this is just my opinion but I, like most people, don't put any stock in critics' reviews. They are usually the opposite of what I end up feeling. Perfect example is Seven Pounds(2008). There were the most painfully bad reviews the weekend this movie opened, and going hand in hand with those negative reviews(by critics) was a tomatometer rating of 26%. I personally LOVE this movie, and I know alot of other movie fans, and Will Smith fans, who love it as well and they're jaws drop everytime I mention that this movie got such horrendously negative press. The audience rating for Seven Pounds btw is 77%. I'd rest my case but I feel like saying a little more.
It's also a pretty impossibly task to determine what makes a positive or negative review. Especially if you read reviews by critics or certain webmasters which contain blatantly ambiguous phrases which would lead you to believe they're going to slam the movie and then at the last sentence of the paragraph...................7/10! And vice versa.
Here's an example of each, see if you can determine the end result:
Star Wars:Clone Wars Review -
"As much as I worried about how the animation looked in the trailers, I’ve got to admit within about 3 minutes I was totally sold on it and thought it worked and looked quite beautiful."
"Instead of the iconic opening crawl setting the stage, some 1960′s game show announcer does some ass awful narration to start the film. I wanted to claw out my own ears he sounded so bad. Damn… and we’re only 30 seconds into the movie!"
"The dialog was beyond horrendous. I’m not even going to go into it""Yes, there are many rotten things wrong with this “movie”, but as I mentioned there was a hell of a lot of really high quality action and “fun” that had me being entertained despite the weaknesses. I refuse to call this a true “Star Wars” movie, and I’ll never accept it as cannon, but for what it was, by the time the credits roled I didn’t mind it too much."
Care to guess the rating? 6/10. I don't know about you but that's about the most schizophrenic road map from review to rating I've ever read.
Here's the opposite end:
A Very Harold And Kumar Christmas Review -
"As far as comedy goes it’s undeniable that this movie hits a couple of very strong high notes a few times. There’s a great little homage to the classic “A Christmas Story” frozen pole scene that nearly made me spit up my popcorn, a few sharp and well timed one liners and a great scene exploring the true sexuality of Neil Patrick Harris that all had me laughing really hard. It seems like all the Harold and Kumar films have been able to hit those high notes that provide some of the best laughs of the year."
"It was a very well written and acted scene that I’m sure made a lot of married guys pause for a second to think about their wives"
"You just can’t have a Harold and Kumar film without Neil Patrick Harris. This guy is pure entertainment on a thin stick. No, he wasn’t quite as funny in this third installment of the franchise as he was in the other two, but he still delivered some of the best laughs in the movie and is fun to watch on screen."
"While there certainly are some great laugh out loud moments in A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas, the unfortunate thing is there just aren’t enough. Good comedies have the BIG laugh moments, a bunch of GOOD laugh moments, and then a bunch of smaller grin moments. Harold and Kumar hit the BIG laughs, but after those few scenes there wasn’t much else to smile at. It felt desperate and random and… well… dull"
"There are some big laugh out loud moments with a solid “moral of the story” hit at the end and Neil Patrick Harris is always a treat, but unfortunately it just isn’t all that funny and feels more like a random assortment of skits than a feature film."
Yeah, another spaghetti straw of a review. Annnnnnnnnd drumroll! 4/10!
Seriously, just cut and paste all the multiple personalities represented here and try to make up one positive or one negative review. Exhausting just navigating. Admittedly, I used two reviews from the same person because this individual is a HUGE proponent of the Rotten Tomatoes system. So much so that in virtually every sentence about movies the freshness rating is mentioned ad nauseum. Not a selling point.
Again, this was just my opinion but i know i'm not the only one.